X

ProCon.org Feels Free, But It Isn't

You can always expect thoroughly researched pros, cons, and related information on today’s hottest topics at ProCon.org. Your tax-deductible donations keep this service free and ad-free for 25+ million students, teachers, journalists, and regular folks.
ProCon.org Feels Free, But It Isn't

You can always expect thoroughly researched pros, cons, and related information on today’s hottest topics at ProCon.org. Your tax-deductible donations keep this service free and ad-free for 25+ million students, teachers, journalists, and regular folks.

ProCon.org is needed now more than ever before. These are divisive times. Emotions are heightened. It’s harder to have respectful conversations and to find common ground. ProCon.org gives everyone an unbiased exploration of important issues to encourage understanding and critical thinking. We can all heal the increasing divide and ground conversations with facts. Millions use our site every year, but few give. We’re going to start changing that with your help. Thank you for making a donation today and for sharing ProCon.org with others.
SUPPORT PROCON.ORGX






The Associated Press, in a Dec. 12, 2007 article titled "Suit Threatened Over Got Milk? Parody," by Erica Werner, wrote:

"Milk processors are demanding that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals [PETA] end a publicity campaign that asks 'Got pus? Milk does.'

PETA, which advocates a dairy-free diet, has plastered the slogan on T-shirts, mugs and other merchandise to draw attention to what it says are dangerous levels of somatic cells - pus - in much of the milk sold in this country. The pus gets there because of an udder infection called mastitis that can inflict cows raised for their milk, PETA says.

The California Milk Processor Board, which owns the Got Milk? trademark, has laughed off countless previous knockoffs, from Got Fleas? to Got Freud? The board even has welcomed some as boosting publicity for milk.

But the board contends there is no truth to the pus claims and that PETA is violating the campaign's trademark...

PETA's lawyers planned to reply in a letter Thursday that would dismiss the trademark infringement allegation as 'entirely without merit.'"

Dec. 12, 2007 Associated Press

PETA Response to California Milk Processor Board Complaint Letter PDF (54KB)



The New York Times reported in a Dec. 13, 2007 article by writer Kim Severson:  

"Attorneys for the milk processors sent a letter to PETA in late November ordering them to stop selling items like mugs, mouse pads and barbecue aprons with the slogan 'Got Pus? Milk does.' At issue wasn’t whether milk contains pus...but that PETA was profiting off of a federally registered trademark.

The letter demands that by Dec. 15, PETA ship all the Got Pus gear to the milk processors and provide an accounting of how much money the group made from the campaign. The end game, presumably, is that the processors will demand the profits and, possibly, sue.

PETA has issued a statement today. In it, PETA vows to continue the campaign...

Steve James, executive director of the California Milk Processor Board, said his organization doesn’t have a legal right to stop non-milk related plays on the slogan, like Got Game. But he argues that it does have the right to go after groups profiting off the slogan if it relates to milk.

PETA, of course, disagrees."

Dec. 13, 2007 New York Times

California Milk Processor Board Complaint Letter to PETA PDF (495KB)

Related Links:

  • Top 10 Pros and Cons of the Milk Debate

     

  • Is organic milk healthier than conventional milk?

     

  • Is there any safety or nutritional difference in milk from cows supplemented with hormones such as rbST and milk from cows not supplemented with hormones?