|The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in a Jan. 15, 2008 press release, stated that milk from cloned animals is safe for human consumption:
"After years of detailed study and analysis, the Food and Drug Administration has concluded that meat and milk from clones of cattle, swine, and goats, and the offspring of clones from any species traditionally consumed as food, are as safe to eat as food from conventionally bred animals. There was insufficient information for the agency to reach a conclusion on the safety of food from clones of other animal species, such as sheep...
The agency is not requiring labeling or any other additional measures for food from cattle, swine, and goat clones, or their offspring because food derived from these sources is no different from food derived from conventionally bred animals. Should a producer express a desire for voluntary labeling (e.g., "this product is clone-free"), it will be considered on a case-by-case basis to ensure compliance with statutory requirements that labeling be truthful and not misleading."
Jan. 15, 2008 FDA
The New York Times reported in a Jan. 15, 2008 article titled "FDA Says Food From Cloned Animals Is Safe," by writer Andrew Martin:
"After years of debate, the Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday declared that food from cloned animals and their progeny is safe, removing the last government hurdle before meat and milk derived from copies of prize dairy cows and superior hogs can be sold at grocery stores...
The F.D.A. ruling was a major victory for cloning companies, which hope to use the cloned animals primarily for breeding purposes, selling copies of prize dairy cows, steers and hogs. The company putting the most effort into developing the technology is ViaGen, of Austin, Texas. That company and others have already produced scores of clones that live on American farmsteads, though the F.D.A. has asked the farmers to honor a voluntary moratorium on the sale of clone meat and milk...
Consumer groups and some members of Congress have fought the decision, arguing that there was still not enough science. Some groups also object to the technology on animal-welfare grounds, noting that clones face an elevated risk of health problems early in life."
Jan. 15, 2008 New York Times
Reuters reported in a Jan. 15, 2008 article titled "FDA Approves Cloned Meat, Milk: Newspaper," by reporter Maggie Fox and editor Eric Beech:
"A U.S. Food and Drug Administration report finds that meat and milk from cloned animals is, for the most part, safe to eat, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.
The newspaper said it had obtained a copy of a long-awaited, 968-page 'final risk assessment,' from the agency ahead of release.
It said FDA experts measured vitamins A, C, B1, B2, B6 and B12 as well as niacin, pantothenic acid, calcium, iron, phosphorous, zinc, fatty acids, cholesterol, fat, protein, amino acids and lactose in meat and milk from 600 cloned animals, including cattle and pigs.
Levels all looked normal.
The agency also found no health effects in animals fed meat and milk from cloned animals for more than three months...
'Moral, religious and ethical concerns ... have been raised,' the newspaper quotes the FDA as saying in a commentary.
But the agency decided to go with science alone."
Jan. 15, 2008 Reuters
Top 10 Pros and Cons of the Milk Debate
Is organic milk healthier than conventional milk?
Is there any safety or nutritional difference in milk from cows supplemented with hormones such as rbST and milk from cows not supplemented with hormones?